War exhaustion for the small empire vs the AI Federation is at 89%. Once the 24 month timer has ended, it is now possible to. I do not remember a time where the AI refuses a status quo if they have 100% exhaustion. I have completely occupied the main targets space and I mean there is literally not a single system or star that they have control over, their fleet is removed and my main fleets are on their way to blitzkrieg their ally aswell. . War exhaustion represents your population’s willingness to continue fighting. I'm not talking about the war exhaustion from battles, I'm talking about the passive attrition rate. You can win a war with 100% war exhaustion while your opponent is at 1%. 9, You claim something before the war and get it if the ennemy accept the surrender. Check the beta, there was a patch notes and dev diary listing the change: "100 war exhaustion no longer forces you to surrender. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. When you reach 100 war exhaustion, you can't be forced to surrender unconditionally. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. I let the war go on for a while longer but it still won't let me end this war. that sounds like a bug, because normally if both hit the 100 % mark, the war ends. How to fix stellaris war exhaustion system: -Remove war exhaustion system and replace it with an occupied planets stability level, and an army capacity (Similar to fleet capacity), and a war goal completion meter, (for how likely it is you will achieve your war goal, affects surrender and other aspects, similar to the old system but without. #1. The current stellaris war exhaustion mechanic is a terribly awful mechanic and is probably one of the least fun aspects of the game. This is why anchorages are important. But if you're fully occupying some of their systems that you claimed, you're still going to "win" the war - you'll get a bunch of. Fleets are completely destroyed and all planets are occupied. Same issue. War Exhaustion trigger percent: 40%. Now the economy is actually compelling and diplomacy will almost receive a rework as well, that doesn't need to be the case any more. A war of aggression was declared against me by an empire south of me (Nharr Empire). It usually says why they won't capitulate. Stellaris. No you don't understand I think- the war doesn't have to end in a surrender. But since that red bar is counting War Exhaustion, I think you should triple check. Otherwise you could just declare Containment war, exhaust them, and when they surrender instantly anex everything. War exhaustion increases in 3 ways. The original empire has no reason to surrender as they are hoping the other empire will save them. At this point you get whatever the war is being waged for. due ti my war exhaustion being at 100 and the enemy at 14. War Exhaustion is terrible. If neither AI asks the other for peace, it can continue indefinitely. 631. They haven't had a. Yes war exhaustion should exist but in a very different way. Yeah, they really need to make spotting unconquered claims easier, especially in wars where your ally made the claims. Aaronthelemon Dec 12, 2018 @ 6:48am. No, you're wrong. What RAR said. My gripes with the combat system: Even when extremely outnumbered, disengage can yield 0 losses (aka 0 War. But even with this setup, the AI does not surrender at 100%. The problem is that you usually do not. The ai only did status quo when it was at 100% war exhaustion for a little while. The war exhaustion information is always accurate, but working out where the war exhaustion comes from can be essentially impossible in all but the most straight forward engagements. On the topic of War Score and War Exhaustion. the other attacking enemy was on like 100% war exhaustion. A little bit of a click-baity title, specifically I'm really tired of being unable to claim victory due to stupid numbers of civs in a war. The system is a little strange, but there is a logic behind it. War exhaustion is constantly added, just the amount can be changed. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. 100% war exhaustion doesn't mean the state that's at it can make peace. There was no way to force AI to surrender. Any time a ship is lost. One of the Khan's sucessor states ought to be totally beaten, they're at 100% exhaustion, but they have one system left and I can't get to it because a neutral empire closed its boadrers to me. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. For many casus belli it's pointless to pursue surrender because status quo already gives you everything you want. #3. #4. if you click those you can open up the war screen itself and. Eventually its +100 from exhaustion so still -50. Maybe 2-3. Adding to this, a "status quo" peace isn't as bad as it sounds. It should be a scaling modifier like in EU4. Systems occupied by this side will be immediately ceded, making cede_claims and release_occupied_systems_on_status_quo fields irrelevant. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. But if you are at 5% attrition or 80% does not make a difference. Any time a ground unit is lost. With automatic Status Quo. . Stellaris is kind of simplified compared to other titles in war score. The only way to force an opponent to surrender in Stellaris is to occupy 100% of the opponents assets. Kempeorlaxan May 3, 2020 @ 1:26am War Exhaustion 100% Surrender Question I played as Terravore on higher difficulties - one of the advanced AI expanded very fast and. Stellaris. Make it make sense It does make sense: War Exhaustion is not war score. The AI doesn't have to surrender at 100% War Exhaustion either. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…Gestalt Consciousness gives you a cool -20% to War Exhaustion. If one side reaches 100% they win by enforcing their war goals, same for the attacker and defender. The war exhaustion in this. You'd peace out *before* you hit 100% war exhaustion in this case. Enemy won't surrender, even after I've taken all they're planets. The status quo peace is like a compromise if u own a claimed system when a status quo happens you get said system and vice versa , u don’t usually need to bomb planets you just need to make a bigger army to take them, the status quo can be forced on you 2 years after you hit 100% war exhaustion and vice versa, in order to achieve your wargoal u need to. Report. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. Production beefed up, war technologies prioritized, and expedited when possible. The AI doesn't auto surrender at 100% war exhaustion. They didn't want to surrender so I killed half their population and yet still nothing. Once your war exhaustion reaches 100%, you have a two-year grace period, after which if your opponent wants peace, they can force you to accept it. The increases for 1 and 2 are a static amount. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. #1. 5 war exhaustion. Always occupy then status quo by driving enemy war exhaustion to 100. It is now about war exhaustion. Both planets are heavily defended but I. Meanwhile, the winner will usually get to 100% war exhaustion more slowly so he gets the ability to force peace at an opportunate moment first. #11. If you want the enemy to surrender, you actually need to defeat them (that means conquering their colonies). Great job ruining a great game, im ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ done. Business, Economics, and Finance. The war exhaustion system in stellaris is quite different. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every. Base War exhaustion is 3x faster. The speed at which War Exhaustion accumulates is influenced by factors such as ethics, traditions, technology and the amount of claims being pressed - an empire that is fighting to hold onto a handful of border systems will tire of a. I think you have basically disabled War Exhaustion. It only really exists to avoid having never ending wars and doesn’t feel like it represents a real war exhaustion (no impact on anything, except artificially. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. Sure it won't change that issue but it's not really an issue, if an empire is doing so poorly their war exhaustion is at 100% then clearly they're massively losing war so they should be crumbling in short order. It says I have -1000 acceptance simply because of my “Absorption” Wargoal. ago. I would rather say the opposite. But every war is different. The war ends faster if the loss is acceptable, and more so if you have a solid hold over all your war goals. War Exhaustion is just a clock. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. All wars except those of independence have a negative surrender acceptance, which are countered by factors such as relative navy strength (up to +50),. However, despite claiming multiple systems and capturing a few worlds I find that MY war exhaustion is going up rather fast, Apparently, losing a few high tier armies in the ground wars means that it causes my war. To be exact, they are forced to ACCEPT a status quo. Which seems a tad muchI feel your pain. A big contributor is loss of ships. It takes 10 days for armies in orbit to land on a world. Problem is having max war exhaustion cause unrest isn't really tenable with the way the game works now. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. white peace is your goal in war for Stellaris. The speed at which War Exhaustion accumulates is influenced by factors such as ethics, traditions, technology and the amount of claims being pressed - an empire that is fighting to hold onto a handful of border systems will tire of a costly conflict quicker than one whose very. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. ago. You can win a fight but gain more exhaustion because you lost a higher proportion of your ships, same with invasions. CryptoThe first person to hit 100% war exhaustion can only surrender when the other party lets them do it. You could give one or even both empires alloys. I don't want to go to war with the AI Federation. In Stellaris you loose no ships, take no damage, business is booming, you're maxed out on all resources, you have no enemy ships to fight, you still get war exhaustion. the awakened empire can force status quo because of your war exhaustion, but if it’s winning, it won. That’s what happens in stellaris. frogandbanjo • 5 yr. At that point the status quo peace returns all your planets and systems UNLESS someone has claims on them. If you're fighting to save your home and loved ones, you'll be much less inclined to surrender no matter the cost. I'm addicted to Stellaris rn, but I actively avoid going to war at all costs. Posted by u/slartinartfast256 - 2 votes and 3 commentsYes, war exhaustion is terrible. g. I was forced to surrender a humiliation war with two systems untouched, so i assumed the player was playing under the same rules as the AI on this. War exhaustion has two effects: 1. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. Novaseerblyat • Machine Intelligence • 6 mo. They have 2 planets left and I'm occupying both of them. Whenever i attack someone, my war exhaustion builds up much faster than them, even if im getting all my claimed systems and that being my wargoal. Not just because you need to build up to your fleet, but because they reduce war exhaustion from space battles. You have the perfect start. Even in victory casualties, resource drain, and general stress accumulate into exhaustion. 11. You need to stack enough positive modifiers (enemy war exhaustion, occupation, and relative fleet power) to overpower it - or take a status quo instead. He attacks me twice, I lose some ships but win the battles. You know one capitulates, but others fight still. CryptoA war where nothing happens should build up We, but being stuck at 100 for years with no way out but surrender seems like a bad outcome. Apparently my nation is 78% towards accepting a forced status quo, while the enemy only 56%. War exhaustion is an iwin button. WTF War Exhaustion. The current system, of a 2 year timer after 100% war exhaustion, could be implemented, where your stability multiplier is the average of your last 2 years war exhaustion values. CryptoIf you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. You just need enough to enforce the demand on the war screen that you need to check. This is especially true in the case of wars of conquest, in which it is possible to get everything you want out of the war even if you are forced to accept a status quo peace. . The war ends faster if the loss is acceptable, and more so if you have a solid hold over all your war goals. The war exhaustion is gained based on the cumulative losses sustained on a percentage basis. Honestly stellaris should just import eu4's war exhaustion, stability and war score system (but add more ws gain. 2. If you don't end the. Business, Economics, and Finance. While watching Arumba play apocalypse today he got into a war in which the AI forced him to 100% war exhaustion. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. Feb 24, 2018. Question. You declare a war, take your claims, then white piece out. However I saw no way to change my war goals. They don't have ships or fleets anymore. Mainly. r/Stellaris • War exhaustion should be replaced with war taxes, happiness penalties and inner politics. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. There are many complaints on the forums and internet about the way War Exhaustion currently works in Stellaris as of version 2. Split your fleets so you can wipe them out faster. Both planets are heavily defended but I. CryptoThere is a difference between war exhaustion and occupation score. The effect that has varies based on your war goals. Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, you can force a status quo peace. Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, so that both sides are at 100%, 2 years later the war will automatically end with a status quo peace. Because sometimes they don't even build ships. If you want an enemy to surrender, you need to get your War Score up to a certain number (which is determined by the kind of war you're waging, the. The "war exhaustion timer" is for status quo, not for complete victory. You've missed one planet (-100) and two systems (-40. Stellaris is supposed to be a game that actually simulates running an empire, not just a game of chess in space with extra rules. It favors the defender as a way to help ward off early aggression and give newer players the ability regroup. Stellaris is explicitly a space GSG, war had just taken the spotlight because everything else was shallow and unsatisfying. Perhaps the solution is to remove war exhaustion for total wars completely, but leaving it for other wars. . Imagine declaring a war, taking all the territory you can. This is honestly the most annoying part for me. You are in a race if you want to conquer someone in a single go. If you can't land on his planets, then a war amounts to nothing, unless you actually just want their empty systems. For occupation it is more important to occupy their planets, than the systems/starbases. 400K subscribers in the Stellaris community. Business, Economics, and Finance. I have gathered 27% exhaustion for 11 ships lost, 0% due to 5 armies lost, they have gathered 22% due to 67 ships lost, and 0% due to 141 armies lost. As the game goes on, empires accumulate tech and traditions that lower the accumulation rate for war exhaustion meaning the wars will drag on longer. Join. HoI4 is explicitly a war game. Yes, they have enough fleets somewhere. I share some desire for more empire sprawl mitigation for determined. Why am I not. Goal was to cede one planet and vassalize remainder. I have NO DLC and this is my fourth or fifth game War score is how badly you beat them, war exhaustion is their will to keep fighting. Forum listWar Exhaustion doesn't mean you have to surrender. 113. This can be a voluntary surrender, or the attacker can force a surrender if the defender has no hope of victory. Crisis empires get the -75% war exhaustion bonus at stage two, when they can still wage normal wars and well before triggering the galaxy-wide total war. You can win a war with 100% war exhaustion while your opponent is at 1%. Upon declaring victory or surrender, the victor receives a bonus to energy credits, influence, and a happiness modifier to their empire. The first step is to have a functioning and efficient economy. . It depends on time and on losses you suffer, even in victory. Can someone please explain me the war exhaustion? I already played 2 games and in both, an empire declares war on me with at least 6 claims (+/-). 2. Waging wars in Stellaris ever since the CB system was added was not exactly fun. cap every single system, invade all…There is no actual war exhaustion in the game. 1% reduction. [district id] effect add_planet. I have NO DLC and this is my fourth or fifth gameWar score is how badly you beat them, war exhaustion is their will to keep fighting. AFAIK there is only one condition for forced surrender : all your planets are under enemy control. Even tho I’m running laps around their alliance, I can’t win. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. 3 is based off the fleet value of the ship and your ship capacity. 2. I'm just here to put my chips in the "war exhaustion is broken" stack. 1. As most of us know, war exhaustion in Stellaris is little more than a timer that eventually force empires to sign a white…Here's the exhaustion details: Attrition: 14%. I lost zero soldiers on the attack, because it was a test game and I had way over-tiered soldiers they had no hope of resisting. No Please explain your issue is in as much detail as possible. With automatic Status Quo peace, forcing attackers into Pyrrhic victories was a viable strategy to control your losses in the peace. . Best workaround I know of is to pause the game, open the console ["~"], and type "play 01", "play 02", "play 03" and so on until you are in control of your ally's empire, or the enemy empire. OgamiGoro Apr 13, 2020 @ 1:37pm. War Exhaustion has no effect on stability. the way war exhaustion is presented is currently misleading. and I have 30% again despite minimal casualties and no system losses. War Exhaustion is just a clock. 12. Your War Exhaustion hits 100% but you are close to conquering everything, so you risk continuing the War. - Never surrender (-25%) Also the first tech is just a tier 2, you can get it very early:. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every system in their empire and it reduces their. #7. ago. Declare War, invade system. The number of armies that can be engaged in combat on either side is five plus one-fifth of the planet size. Nationalistic Zeal civic gives you -10%, there are others you can take advantage of as well. That should be factored into your war planning. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Nothing happens-- 10% chance. #2. That means every system and planet of ALL opponents, including allies, not just the main target. Resulting in the common situation that even tho your fleet can destroy the enemy easily, you are forced to surrender and give up the territories you coundt reach in time. CryptoWar exhaustion basically vanishes the moment the war is over and starts over at zero if you go right into the next war. He attacks me twice, I lose some ships but win the battles. If the other side surrenders, all of their systems will be ceded. You need to deal with the other empire now. You could have won years ago (100% war exhaustion starts a countdown, the enemy can’t force leave immediately) but you didn’t and this mechanic represents your citizenry becoming sick of it. No-one else is at war with any of the federation members including the Ovarians. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. So I have a war going on against a faction and their ally. Elitewrecker PT Sep 17, 2021 @ 7:04am. Usually I find they won't accept due to demanding unoccupied systems/planets. Usually if. The exhaustion percentage is creeping up so slowly that it will probably be a hundred years before it gets to 100 percent and hopefully the Caloctora will surrender even though the Fallen Empire hasn't done a thing to them. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. But even with this setup, the AI does not surrender at 100%. Over the decades, I've managed to beat them into "Inferior/Pathetic" fleet status, and claim a third of their empire. They were at 100% war Exhaustion I was at like 30% So lets end this war. Hopefully having 2x or 3x the required warscore for 100% will allow me to conclude these wars the way I'd expect. WTF. you’re losing, you / your ally can’t sue for status quo as the awakened empire won’t accept it. Because right now - according to the Devs no less - forcing surrender requires 100% war exhaustion AND 100% occupation. If I was to surrender I would be totally integrated beacuse of their ideology. Wargoals at 100% and AI will not surrender. As I am in a federation, I was eventually asked to vote for or against a war with a neighboor we had previously fought with. Ships 'destroyed' this way cause 5x war exhaustion. 100% war exhaustion alone isn't enough to get the enemy to capitulate, but it does give a +100 modifier to the calculations used by the AI to decide when to surrender. War Exhaustion 100% means the AI will accept a Status Quo peace, nothing more. Crisis empires get the -75% war exhaustion bonus at stage two, when they can still wage normal wars and well before triggering the galaxy-wide total war. Maybe just crack their home planet to fully demoralize the survivors. . Use a race with modifiers to war exhaustion. My war exhaustion is at like 13% for both sides. There's a tradition in Unyielding that also grants . Edit: war exhaustion, not ear exhaustion. Paradox Forum. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). They never managed to enter my space. War exhaustion in the absolute best case just. If I was to surrender I would be totally integrated beacuse of their. Every planet, every outpost, not matter how remote. was still negative for SQ and even more so for wargoals. Like here. Tributary war goal. Each side has a war leader. I'm not totally convinced you do understand the system. That's how we lost the Vietnam war, too. Guaranteed Independence leads to Neverending War!! I have a rival empire just below me that's been a pain in my ass since the beginning. War exhaustion . War exhaustion in Stellaris the most most broken shit ever. I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. Excess armies are initially placed in a reserve area behind the frontline and replace any. Currently the war exhaustion is heavily weighted toward the empire that has caused the most damage to units rather than what they have set out. Once it hits 100% War Exhaustion, there's no reason for it to -not- throw hundreds of ships away in an effort to blow up one or two corvettes. My gripes with the combat system: Even when extremely outnumbered, disengage can yield 0 losses (aka 0. This means that if you lost 10 out 100 naval capacity worth of ships and the AI lost 20 out of 200 naval capacity. But no, they just give 0. Choosing a different war goal may have different surrender thresholds. The Ovarians have reached 100% war exhaustion. The remaining few are fully under control of a rebelious faction that revolted against the FP"empire at the start of. but one weird mechanic…Full war exhaustion is when one side can force white peace on the other side. Note, this is for forcing them to surrender whether they want to or not. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. The enforced peace that prevents you from retaking lost planets etc when you finally get an advantage in a long war is just stupid, frustrating and unfun. Story/rant time: I declare war on an awakened empire and absolutely stomp their entire fleet, their war exhaustion shoots up to 70 while mine is only at 20. More confusingly, my enemy has zero war exhaustion from all these battles he has lost. no, there is no forced surrender. Think of Russia during WWII; they fought on despite taking massive losses. You have to open the war view and choose "status quo. ) It counts as points towards the enemy's willingness to surrender or accept a status quo. . I won every single battle (land or space). Can't invade the ally to try and force a surrender either since there's a 4th nation blocking you. 380K subscribers in the Stellaris community. 25 Now 0. If you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. Speaking of using RP to explain certain game mechanics, I think it makes sense that losing troops on planetary defense wouldn't contribute to war exhaustion. 3. Question. I could not select the force surrender option, even when they had 0 star bases and all planets were occupied. Cato, they are not the same in Stellaris either. The AI…This war has been going on for almost 15 years. " I feel like this is a solid change. WTF is war on a timer?. I have not observed it otherwise. I think there should be no passive attrition, it should only comes with some factors:-having systems occupied by the enemy-having a resource decreasing-having a resource at 0 Also, any fix to alliance War Exhaustion has to ensure that the 1v1 wars are not affected. The extra +100 only applies to status quo lol. Oh, and force you to use the total war casus belli, which, while it allows you to wage total war without the need for claims in the lategame (thank you), it also means your enemies will near never surrender, despite you NOT being a fanatical purifier or whatever, and despite the fact that surrendering. They have very little chance of recouping from this as they have no fleets, no. 5 (Ships are more harder to replace than troops but still they are replaceable) WAR_EXHAUSTION_ARMY_KILLED_MULT = 0. No-one but federation members occupy planets or systems of the Ovarians. Most of its weight comes from occupied planets so carpet sieging planets is the best way to win a war fast. Instead, your unity gain is reduced by 90% and your influence gain is set to 0. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…I'm enjoying the changes to the game but the new war exhaustion system is frustrating. Been playing Stellaris since release, but recently came back after a long break. So here's what might have actually happened: 1.